<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewing the Reviews: #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/</link>
	<description>You're feeling better already.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 01:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stereopathic Music</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Stereopathic Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] even though we haven&#8217;t always had great things to say about Pitchfork, I can&#8217;t help but swell with pride when I see them looking favorably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even though we haven&#8217;t always had great things to say about Pitchfork, I can&#8217;t help but swell with pride when I see them looking favorably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stereopathic Music</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Stereopathic Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] Although I haven&#8217;t yet read (or even purchased) Celine Dion&#8217;s Let&#8217;s Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste by the non-Beach Boy Carl Wilson, the book has been catching my attention more and more. He just recently appeared on The Colbert Report talking about the book (we have the video after the jump). It looks like he&#8217;s working in proximity to some of the issues that I&#8217;ve mentioned on a previous post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although I haven&#8217;t yet read (or even purchased) Celine Dion&#8217;s Let&#8217;s Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste by the non-Beach Boy Carl Wilson, the book has been catching my attention more and more. He just recently appeared on The Colbert Report talking about the book (we have the video after the jump). It looks like he&#8217;s working in proximity to some of the issues that I&#8217;ve mentioned on a previous post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooser</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Maybe even in haiku. I&#039;m serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe even in haiku. I&#8217;m serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JStevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>JStevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-56</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not a bad idea, Austin. One on the lyrics, one on the music, and only one on the artist&#039;s persona or cultural relevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not a bad idea, Austin. One on the lyrics, one on the music, and only one on the artist&#8217;s persona or cultural relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JStevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>JStevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Gabe. I think you&#039;re right that music is changing, but I also think that music has always been emotional and judging music has always been complicated. Giving something a rating is an overly efficient way to deliver an opinion. Because it&#039;s such a final, easy method of assigning value to something, I don&#039;t think we can trust it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Gabe. I think you&#8217;re right that music is changing, but I also think that music has always been emotional and judging music has always been complicated. Giving something a rating is an overly efficient way to deliver an opinion. Because it&#8217;s such a final, easy method of assigning value to something, I don&#8217;t think we can trust it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Maybe if instead of a 1-10 scale they gave us 3-4 twitter-length (less than 140 characters) statements. A hipster briefing of talking points. I&#039;d read that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if instead of a 1-10 scale they gave us 3-4 twitter-length (less than 140 characters) statements. A hipster briefing of talking points. I&#8217;d read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Pitchfork doesn&#039;t give some music the rating it deserves. Department Of Eagle&#039;s &quot;In Ear Park&quot; only got an 8.3. Whereas Animal Collective&#039;s &quot;Merriweather Post Pavilion&quot; got 9.6. I think what Pitchfork takes into account is not the actual music. It is more the place in society or culture that the music will take. While &quot;In Ear Park&quot; is, in my opinion, one of the best albums I&#039;ve ever heard, it doesn&#039;t break new ground. It just uses the old ground to make something spectacular with it. &quot;Merriweather Post Pavilion&quot; is more of an edgy and &quot;out there&quot; sound that Pitchfork thinks is going to catch on. Pitchfork wants to hop on that boat and be able to say &quot;We thought this music was good when it first started. . .&quot; or something to that effect. In most Pitchfork reviews, the reviewer ends up just telling the story behind the record. . . That&#039;s all well and good, but I want to hear about the actual sounds of music. The thing is, I think reviewing music is going to be hard to do in the future. Because of the new sounds it&#039;s hard to describe what music sounds like unless you can relate it to another band. I think music has become so much more emotional that you can&#039;t just rate the way the music actually sounds but, you also have to rate the emotion it gives you which is something completely different for every person. 

I hope I didn&#039;t rant for too long. I&#039;m with Josh on Veckatimest. I actually downloaded it, but I couldn&#039;t bring myself to listen to it. These ideas are probably not coherent at all. . . Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitchfork doesn&#8217;t give some music the rating it deserves. Department Of Eagle&#8217;s &#8220;In Ear Park&#8221; only got an 8.3. Whereas Animal Collective&#8217;s &#8220;Merriweather Post Pavilion&#8221; got 9.6. I think what Pitchfork takes into account is not the actual music. It is more the place in society or culture that the music will take. While &#8220;In Ear Park&#8221; is, in my opinion, one of the best albums I&#8217;ve ever heard, it doesn&#8217;t break new ground. It just uses the old ground to make something spectacular with it. &#8220;Merriweather Post Pavilion&#8221; is more of an edgy and &#8220;out there&#8221; sound that Pitchfork thinks is going to catch on. Pitchfork wants to hop on that boat and be able to say &#8220;We thought this music was good when it first started. . .&#8221; or something to that effect. In most Pitchfork reviews, the reviewer ends up just telling the story behind the record. . . That&#8217;s all well and good, but I want to hear about the actual sounds of music. The thing is, I think reviewing music is going to be hard to do in the future. Because of the new sounds it&#8217;s hard to describe what music sounds like unless you can relate it to another band. I think music has become so much more emotional that you can&#8217;t just rate the way the music actually sounds but, you also have to rate the emotion it gives you which is something completely different for every person. </p>
<p>I hope I didn&#8217;t rant for too long. I&#8217;m with Josh on Veckatimest. I actually downloaded it, but I couldn&#8217;t bring myself to listen to it. These ideas are probably not coherent at all. . . Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larson</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Jason.  My hope: that the new Grizzly Bear album (that Josh refuses to listen to until it is officially released in May) will become the new standard/definition of &quot;Prog Rock.&quot; The album, Veckatimest, represents the &quot;fullness of time&quot; for music right now.  It nods to so many old styles &amp; genres, from mo-town to electronica, and ties in current themes like Bon Iver and Fleet Foxes (with all of the Beach Boys influences) and breaks new ground.  Ahh...so nice. (Josh - it&#039;ll be so much better when you finally do hear it, with all of this build-up)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Jason.  My hope: that the new Grizzly Bear album (that Josh refuses to listen to until it is officially released in May) will become the new standard/definition of &#8220;Prog Rock.&#8221; The album, Veckatimest, represents the &#8220;fullness of time&#8221; for music right now.  It nods to so many old styles &#038; genres, from mo-town to electronica, and ties in current themes like Bon Iver and Fleet Foxes (with all of the Beach Boys influences) and breaks new ground.  Ahh&#8230;so nice. (Josh &#8211; it&#8217;ll be so much better when you finally do hear it, with all of this build-up)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Two thumbs.

It&#039;s been long enough that every kid and his brother has had a computer and an electric guitar for us to have nigh explored the absolute outer limits of what may be called music. So much of what is considered ground-breaking, I find provokes little more than tedium and ennui.

I hardly think that a meaningful musical review could be produced by critics who treat their job like they were testing toilet paper. I fell in love with Sky Blue Sky in the first listen, but I find that most albums need at least five or six plays  before I can really appreciate the music and discover what depth may be there. In my opinion Wilco and M. Ward gave the world something much more valuable than Rainbows, so what gives?

Really, I believe, it is a lot more difficult to produce, and a lot more satisfying to hear, good, well-written music in the traditional formulae, than something that is always striving to push the envelope. I look forward to true ground being broken by talented and dedicated classically and folk-trained musicians who unearth old material to plant new seeds in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thumbs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been long enough that every kid and his brother has had a computer and an electric guitar for us to have nigh explored the absolute outer limits of what may be called music. So much of what is considered ground-breaking, I find provokes little more than tedium and ennui.</p>
<p>I hardly think that a meaningful musical review could be produced by critics who treat their job like they were testing toilet paper. I fell in love with Sky Blue Sky in the first listen, but I find that most albums need at least five or six plays  before I can really appreciate the music and discover what depth may be there. In my opinion Wilco and M. Ward gave the world something much more valuable than Rainbows, so what gives?</p>
<p>Really, I believe, it is a lot more difficult to produce, and a lot more satisfying to hear, good, well-written music in the traditional formulae, than something that is always striving to push the envelope. I look forward to true ground being broken by talented and dedicated classically and folk-trained musicians who unearth old material to plant new seeds in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JStevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/2009/03/reviewing-the-reviews-1/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>JStevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereopathicmusic.com/?p=289#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think it makes a lot of sense. You&#039;re getting at something I definitely want to deal with more in future articles. Good points yerself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it makes a lot of sense. You&#8217;re getting at something I definitely want to deal with more in future articles. Good points yerself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

